Yo!

[Kevin]

(05-01-2010 08:52 AM)Jonny Wrote:  Cisco are very sort of restricting. Sort of like all the big companies these days. They restrict so much of their technology to their own devices, alot of good routing protocols, security measures.

I'm not arguing with you (more Cisco), but that's a pretty poor excuse. Actually, it's a very poor excuse. Honestly, if an application is designed with security in mind but it doesn't support the latest and greatest of security protocols then it isn't worth its bits.

[Jonny]

(05-01-2010 10:54 PM)Kevin Wrote:  

(05-01-2010 08:52 AM)Jonny Wrote:  Cisco are very sort of restricting. Sort of like all the big companies these days. They restrict so much of their technology to their own devices, alot of good routing protocols, security measures.

I'm not arguing with you (more Cisco), but that's a pretty poor excuse. Actually, it's a very poor excuse. Honestly, if an application is designed with security in mind but it doesn't support the latest and greatest of security protocols then it isn't worth its bits.

Obviously. I never said that was the case, I was just quoting how in a real life situation as a network designer, you have to have Cisco proprietary devices to enable some great technology on your network.

[bdh734]

WOW!
Perhaps we should look at this

Code:

http://bit.ly/db9hDB